|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
New machine for ****box
Hi folks,
K, I have finally put a new machine in for ****box. It's still not super high-end (700Mhz PIII with 384Mb) but it should at least be more stable and come back up when rebooting. I also did a dist-upgrade. I hope that wasn't a bad thing. I'm still a little concerned about the HD but I'm not sure how much trouble it would be to get it up on a new one. I'm up for suggestions, etc. I also have a nicer machine P4 (2.4Ghz or so I think) that I was thinking about replacing flubber with but I am wondering if that makes the most sense? Since flubber is now the wiki code and such, should it be taken out of the more "public" role? I'm thinking maybe using the gnubber hardware for flubber and set up a new gnubber might make more sense. Thoughts? Thanks! Barry deFreese |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
New machine for ****box
Hi,
Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:56:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: I'm still a little concerned about the HD but I'm not sure how much trouble it would be to get it up on a new one. I'm up for suggestions, etc. Shouldn't be a problem I think Just copy the whole disk :-) I also have a nicer machine P4 (2.4Ghz or so I think) that I was thinking about replacing flubber with but I am wondering if that makes the most sense? Since flubber is now the wiki code and such, should it be taken out of the more "public" role? I'm thinking maybe using the gnubber hardware for flubber and set up a new gnubber might make more sense. Well, I'm always feeling a bit strange about the fact that a public machine prone to frequent crashes is also used for the wiki the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it for the wiki exclusively would be a waste Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-) -antrik- |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
New machine for ****box
Hello!
Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 12:57:27PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:52:07 +0200, a : Maybe I am wrong, but updates on wiki content should trigger little bursts of activity, not sustained periods of 100% cpu load. The wiki engine regenerates all the pages, that's what takes time. As I said before: it regenerates only those that need to be regenerated. Regards, Thomas PGP SIGNATURE Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) ldEnB6zx8UiJZ5lkDIJ6PsM= =xXGB PGP SIGNATURE |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
New machine for ****box / wiki system
Barry deFreese, le Tue 08 Jul 2008 12:28:57 -0400, a :
By "working Debian system" do you mean Debian GNU/Linux or a Debian Hurd system? A GNU/Linux system, since gnumach does not support running as dom0. Samuel |
![]() |
| Viewing: Web Development Archives > Mailing Lists > Unix > New machine for shitbox |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|