Samba
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Web Development Archives Mailing Lists Samba

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Web Development Archives Sponsor:
  #1  
Old July 1st, 2008, 08:31 PM
Luke Howard
Guest
Dev Archives Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Posts: n/a  
Time spent in forums:
Reputation Power:
Kerberos 5 and NTLMv2 without SPNEGO?

02/07/2008, at 1:49 AM, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:

PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
Hash: SHA1
>

Michael B Allen wrote:
>Dear Cousin,
>>

>Does anyone know if it's ok to do Kerberos 5 and / or NTLMSSP without
>SPNEG for SMB_CM_SESSIN_SETUP_ANDX?
>>

>I'm 95% sure the answer is "yes" but it would be nice if someone gave
>me assuring pat on the head.
>

Pretty sure. Been a while since I looked but I think this is how
Steve previously did NTLMSSP in the cifs fs.


I think Windows still does raw NTLMSSP too never seen raw Kerberos
though, but SSPI is sufficiently well layered that I would expect it
to work.

-- Luke

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 2nd, 2008, 06:32 AM
Luke Howard
Guest
Dev Archives Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Posts: n/a  
Time spent in forums:
Reputation Power:
Kerberos 5 and NTLMv2 without SPNEGO?

02/07/2008, at 5:53 PM, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:

Luke Howard schrieb:
I was able to get raw NTLMSSP w/ NTLMv2 and raw Kerberos 5 working.
Hopefully it will work reliably with all the major servers.
>>

>That's a fair concern, given that a lot of server implementations
>were
>built from packet traces or incomplete documentation. NetApp, for
>example, do not support big-endian PACs (and neither does Samba
>unless
>that has been fixed recently).
>

when was that fixed in samba? I don't think we support big-endian PACs
in samba4 and I didn't see a related commit in samba3.
>

What server will ever create a big-endian PAC?

None shipping today. XAD did on PWER and S/390. We did have customers
on PWER.

-- Luke

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 2nd, 2008, 06:32 AM
Luke Howard
Guest
Dev Archives Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Posts: n/a  
Time spent in forums:
Reputation Power:
Kerberos 5 and NTLMv2 without SPNEGO?

I was able to get raw NTLMSSP w/ NTLMv2 and raw Kerberos 5 working.
Hopefully it will work reliably with all the major servers.

That's a fair concern, given that a lot of server implementations were
built from packet traces or incomplete documentation. NetApp, for
example, do not support big-endian PACs (and neither does Samba unless
that has been fixed recently).

But I was not able to get NTLMv2 SMB signatures working. From looking
at Samba's libsmb code the UserSessionKey calculation described in
Eric Glass' NTLM doc is completely different. I'm getting the feeling
that SMB just uses it's own rules (as usual).

You might take a look at the MS docs too. From memory the first 16
bytes of the Kerberos session key are used.

-- Luke

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Web Development Archives Mailing Lists Samba > Kerberos 5 and NTLMv2 without SPNEGO?


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 5 hosted by Hostway