|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Air traffic control and congestion
There seems to be more to ATC than I had thought previously,
things that seem non-technical, but only at first sight. A friend is working at an airport. Luggage. Boarding, etc. This weekend, he explained how the schleduling of flights is affected by what can only be attributed to calculable adminstrative issues at all levels. at least, they are observable. Quite consistently, a chaotic bustle is the foreseeable outcome of certain types of organizational decision making. The normal flow of things at the airport is disrupted. I was wondering whether the daily effects such as the following are shaping the design of Air Traffic Conctrol software at all? It seems like some of the effects can be almost formally described and be put in a facts database. - Numbering of gates. Number 80 can be the logical successor of number 39. It is in another building. Now this building happens to also have number 40 - No open stairs between floors (that may or may not serve Schengen flights), only an elevator for 3 persons. flight is announced for the wrong floor and a good part of the entire terminal is blocked by the moving crowd. - Conveyors that have to be stopped because two persons are on sick leave is at a minimum for reasons of competitive pricing (or any comparative form of it). No luggage - Total failure of automatic luggage recognition caused by a minor computer error, but no one is around who has the training to resolve the issue. These mishaps can and *do* cause significant delays. But they can be phrased as IF THEN sentences. Does ATC software address such influences at all? Does it sound familiar, maybe? -- Georg |
![]() |
| Viewing: Web Development Archives > FAQs > Programming > Air traffic control and congestion |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|