Perl
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Web Development Archives Mailing Lists Perl

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Web Development Archives Sponsor:
  #1  
Old July 3rd, 2008, 05:50 PM
Geoffrey Broadwell
Guest
Dev Archives Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Posts: n/a  
Time spent in forums:
Reputation Power:
parrot-0.6.3 with parrot-perl6

First, thank you for working on this!

Now some comments

Thu, 2008-07-03 at 19:07 +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
parrot-languages is my compressed version of the fedora split,
they have for every single language a seperate package.

Thank you for choosing the single-package route here.

I just left the docs/examples, the others stripped it.
pdb is called parrot_pdb, disassemble is called pbc_disassemble.

Both of these are good changes (and I don't think the other packagers
should have stripped the examples; they are arguably necessary to
understand certain constructions, since our official docs are not
complete and are difficult to navigate in places).

.include searchpath:
/usr/runtime/parrot/include
/usr/runtime/parrot
/usr
/usr/lib/parrot/include
/usr/lib/parrot/
.

/usr/runtime doesn't seem "right" to me (and it's not FHS-compliant,
IIRC). I notice that none of your packages install to /usr/runtime, and
I'd prefer to just drop it. Why is raw '/usr' included?

Side note to the Parrot Porters: the redundant 'parrot' directory under
'runtime' in the source tree makes no sense to me. I'm in favor of
moving its three subdirectories up a level, and dropping the extra
cruft.

/usr/share/doc/parrot/LICENSE
/
/usr/share/doc/parrot/TD

Should probably include NEWS here in the main parrot package; for the
last year and a half, all of the key updates have been listed there
(ChangeLog is only useful for historical spelunking, and can be placed
in -devel). Also, CREDITS fills in a lot of details that
RESPNSIBLE_PARTIES leaves out, and it arguably belongs in the main
package right next to the LICENSE. Plus it maximizes karma exposure for
our valued contributor base; for the same reason, I'd vote for
DNRS.pod here as well. A "binary package" version of the official
README that drops the PREREQUISITES, INSTRUCTINS, and NTES blocks
seems like a good idea too.

DEPRECATED.pod and PBC_CMPAT need to be in the -devel package.

Speaking of all these docs, do the various distro ports/packages include
manpages (at least a minimal 'parrot' manpage, as I believe Debian and
BSD require to comply with their respective policies)?


-'f

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Web Development Archives Mailing Lists Perl > parrot-0.6.3 with parrot-perl6


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 4 hosted by Hostway