|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
parrot-0.6.3 with parrot-perl6
First, thank you for working on this!
Now some comments Thu, 2008-07-03 at 19:07 +0200, Reini Urban wrote: parrot-languages is my compressed version of the fedora split, they have for every single language a seperate package. Thank you for choosing the single-package route here. I just left the docs/examples, the others stripped it. pdb is called parrot_pdb, disassemble is called pbc_disassemble. Both of these are good changes (and I don't think the other packagers should have stripped the examples; they are arguably necessary to understand certain constructions, since our official docs are not complete and are difficult to navigate in places). .include searchpath: /usr/runtime/parrot/include /usr/runtime/parrot /usr /usr/lib/parrot/include /usr/lib/parrot/ . /usr/runtime doesn't seem "right" to me (and it's not FHS-compliant, IIRC). I notice that none of your packages install to /usr/runtime, and I'd prefer to just drop it. Why is raw '/usr' included? Side note to the Parrot Porters: the redundant 'parrot' directory under 'runtime' in the source tree makes no sense to me. I'm in favor of moving its three subdirectories up a level, and dropping the extra cruft. /usr/share/doc/parrot/LICENSE / /usr/share/doc/parrot/TD Should probably include NEWS here in the main parrot package; for the last year and a half, all of the key updates have been listed there (ChangeLog is only useful for historical spelunking, and can be placed in -devel). Also, CREDITS fills in a lot of details that RESPNSIBLE_PARTIES leaves out, and it arguably belongs in the main package right next to the LICENSE. Plus it maximizes karma exposure for our valued contributor base; for the same reason, I'd vote for DNRS.pod here as well. A "binary package" version of the official README that drops the PREREQUISITES, INSTRUCTINS, and NTES blocks seems like a good idea too. DEPRECATED.pod and PBC_CMPAT need to be in the -devel package. Speaking of all these docs, do the various distro ports/packages include manpages (at least a minimal 'parrot' manpage, as I believe Debian and BSD require to comply with their respective policies)? -'f |
![]() |
| Viewing: Web Development Archives > Mailing Lists > Perl > parrot-0.6.3 with parrot-perl6 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|