Linux Security
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Web Development Archives Mailing Lists Linux Security

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Web Development Archives Sponsor:
  #1  
Old August 16th, 2006, 10:39 AM
Marcus Meissner
Guest
Dev Archives Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Posts: n/a  
Time spent in forums:
Reputation Power:
SUSE Security Announcement: MozillaFirefox, MozillaThunderbird,

PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
Hash: SHA1



SUSE Security Announcement

Package: MozillaFirefox,MozillaThunderbird,Seamonkey
Announcement ID: SUSE-SA:2006:048
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:00:00 +0000
Affected Products: Novell Linux Desktop 9
SLE SDK 10
SUSE LINUX 10.1
SUSE LINUX 10.0
SUSE LINUX 9.3
SUSE LINUX 9.2
SUSE SLES 10
Vulnerability Type: remote code execution
Severity (1-10): 8
SUSE Default Package: yes
Cross-References: CVE-2006-3113, CVE-2006-3677, CVE-2006-3801
CVE-2006-3802, CVE-2006-3803, CVE-2006-3804
CVE-2006-3805, CVE-2006-3806, CVE-2006-3807
CVE-2006-3808, CVE-2006-3809, CVE-2006-3810
CVE-2006-3811, CVE-2006-3812, MFSA 2006-01
MFSA 2006-10, MFSA 2006-44, MFSA 2006-45
MFSA 2006-46, MFSA 2006-47, MFSA 2006-48
MFSA 2006-49, MFSA 2006-50, MFSA 2006-51
MFSA 2006-52, MFSA 2006-53, MFSA 2006-54
MFSA 2006-55, MFSA 2006-56

Content of This Advisory:
1) Security Vulnerability Resolved:
various mozilla browser security problems
Problem Description
2) Solution or Work-Around
3) Special Instructions and Notes
4) Package Location and Checksums
5) Pending Vulnerabilities, Solutions, and Work-Arounds:
See SUSE Security Summary Report.
6) Authenticity Verification and Additional Information



1) Problem Description and Brief Discussion

To fix various security problems we released update packages that
bring Mozilla Firefox to version 1.5.0.6, MozillaThunderdbird to
version 1.5.0.5 and the Seamonkey Suite to version 1.0.3.

Note that on Novell Linux Desktop 9 and SUSE Linux 9.2 up to 10.0
this is a major version upgrade of Mozilla Firefox, please check if
your Firefox plugins are still working.

Still missing are updates for the (discontinued) Mozilla Suite.

More details on the security problems can be found on:


The update includes fixes to the following security problems:
- CVE-2006-3801/MFSA 2006-44: Code execution through deleted frame reference

Thilo Girmann discovered that in certain circumstances a JavaScript
reference to a frame or window was not properly cleared when the
referenced content went away, and he demonstrated that this pointer
to a deleted object could be used to execute native code supplied
by the attacker.

- CVE-2006-3677/MFSA 2006-45: Javascript navigator Vulnerability

An anonymous researcher for TippingPoint and the Zero Day Initiative
showed that when used in a web page Java would reference properties
of the window.navigator object as it started up. If the page replaced
the navigator object before starting Java then the browser would
crash in a way that could be exploited to run native code supplied
by the attacker.

- CVE-2006-3113/MFSA 2006-46: Memory corruption with simultaneous events

Secunia Research has discovered a vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox
1.5 branch, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise
a user's system.

The vulnerability is caused due to an memory corruption error within
the handling of simultaneously happening XPCM events, which leads
to use of a deleted timer object. This generally results in a crash
but potentially could be exploited to execute arbitrary code on a
user's system when a malicious website is visited.

- CVE-2006-3802/MFSA 2006-47: Native DM methods can be hijacked across
domains

A malicious page can hijack native DM methods on a document object
in another domain, which will run the attacker's script when called
by the victim page. This could be used to steal login cookies,
password, or other sensitive data on the target page, or to perform
actions on behalf of a logged-in user.

Access checks on all other properties and document nodes are
performed correctly. This cross-site scripting (XSS) attack is
limited to pages which use standard DM methods of the top-level
document object, such as document.getElementById(). This includes
many popular sites, especially the newer ones that offer rich
interaction to the user.

- CVE-2006-3803/MFSA 2006-48: JavaScript new Function race condition

H. D. Moore reported a testcase that was able to trigger a race
condition where JavaScript garbage collection deleted a temporary
variable still being used in the creation of a new Function
object. The resulting use of a deleted object may be potentially
exploitable to run native code provided by the attacker.

- CVE-2006-3804/MFSA 2006-49: Heap buffer overwrite on malformed VCard

A VCard attachment with a malformed base64 field (such as a photo)
can trigger a heap buffer overwrite. These have proven exploitable
in the past, though in this case the overwrite is accompanied by
an integer underflow that would attempt to copy more data than the
typical machine has, leading to a crash.

- 2006-50: JavaScript engine vulnerabilities

Continuing our security audit of the JavaScript engine, Mozilla
developers found and fixed several potential vulnerabilities.

Igor Bukanov and shutdown found additional places where an untimely
garbage collection could delete a temporary object that was in active
use (similar to MFSA 2006-01 and MFSA 2006-10). Some of these may
allow an attacker to run arbitrary code given the right conditions.

Georgi Guninski found potential integer overflow issues with long
strings in the toSource() methods of the , Array and String
objects as well as string function arguments.

- CVE-2006-3807/MFSA 2006-51: Privilege escalation using named-functions
and redefined "new ()"

moz_bug_r_a4 discovered that named JavaScript functions have
a parent object created using the standard () constructor
(ECMA-specified behavior) and that this constructor can be redefined
by script (also ECMA-specified behavior). If the () constructor
is changed to return a reference to a privileged object with useful
properties it is possible to have attacker-supplied script excuted
with elevated privileges by calling the function. This could be
used to install malware or take other malicious actions.

fix involves calling the internal constructor which
appears to be what other ECMA-compatible interpreters do.

- CVE-2006-3808/MFSA 2006-52: PAC privilege escalation using
Function.prototype.call

moz_bug_r_a4 reports that a malicious Proxy AutoConfig (PAC)
server could serve a PAC script that can execute code with elevated
privileges by setting the required FindProxyForURL function to
the eval method on a privileged object that leaked into the PAC
sandbox. By redirecting the victim to a specially-crafted URL --
easily done since the PAC script controls which proxy to use --
the URL "hostname" can be executed as privileged script.

A malicious proxy server can perform spoofing attacks on the user
so it was already important to use a trustworthy PAC server.

- CVE-2006-3809/MFSA 2006-53: UniversalBrowserRead privilege escalation

shutdown reports that scripts granted the UniversalBrowserRead
privilege can leverage that into the equivalent of the far more
powerful UniversalXPConnect since they are allowed to "read" into
a privileged context. This allows the attacker the ability to run
scripts with the full privelege of the user running the browser,
possibly installing malware or snooping on private data. This has
been fixed so that UniversalBrowserRead and UniversalBrowserWrite
are limited to reading from and writing into only normally-privileged
browser windows and frames.

- CVE-2006-3810/MFSA 2006-54: XSS with XPCNativeWrapper(window).Function()

shutdown reports that cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks could be
performed using the construct XPCNativeWrapper(window).Function(),
which created a function that appeared to belong to the window in
question even after it had been navigated to the target site.

- CVE-2006-3811/MFSA 2006-55: Crashes with evidence of memory corruption

As part of the Firefox 1.5.0.5 stability and security release,
developers in the Mozilla community looked for and fixed several
crash bugs to improve the stability of Mozilla clients. Some of
these crashes showed evidence of memory corruption that we presume
could be exploited to run arbitrary code with enough effort.

- CVE-2006-3812/MFSA 2006-56: chrome: scheme loading remote content

Benjamin Smedberg discovered that chrome URL's could be made to
reference remote files, which would run scripts with full privilege.
There is no known way for web content to successfully load a
chrome: url, but if a user could be convinced to do so manually
(perhaps by copying a link and pasting it into the location bar)
this could be exploited.

2) Solution or Work-Around

There is no known workaround, please install the update packages.

If you are using the old Mozilla Suite browser we recommend no longer
using it, but switching to Mozilla Firefox, konqueror or

3) Special Instructions and Notes

Please close and restart all running instances of Mozilla Firefox
after the update.

4) Package Location and Checksums

The preferred method for installing security updates is to use the YaST
Update (YU) tool. YU detects which updates are required and
automatically performs the necessary steps to verify and install them.
Alternatively, download the update packages for your distribution manually
and verify their integrity by the methods listed in Section 6 of this
announcement. Then install the packages using the command

rpm -Fhv <file.rpm>

to apply the update, replacing <file.rpmwith the filename of the
downloaded RPM package.


x86 Platform:

SUSE LINUX 10.1:























SUSE LINUX 10.0:







SUSE LINUX 9.3:







SUSE LINUX 9.2:







Power PC Platform:

SUSE LINUX 10.1:























SUSE LINUX 10.0:







x86-64 Platform:

SUSE LINUX 10.1:



















SUSE LINUX 10.0:



SUSE LINUX 9.3:



SUSE LINUX 9.2:







Sources:

SUSE LINUX 10.1:







SUSE LINUX 10.0:





SUSE LINUX 9.3:





SUSE LINUX 9.2:





maintenance customers are notified individually. The packages are
offered for installation from the maintenance web:

SUSE SLES 10


SLE SDK 10


SUSE SLE 10 DEBUGINF


Novell Linux Desktop 9 for x86




5) Pending Vulnerabilities, Solutions, and Work-Arounds:

See SUSE Security Summary Report.


6) Authenticity Verification and Additional Information

- Announcement authenticity verification:

SUSE security announcements are published via mailing lists and on Web
sites. The authenticity and integrity of a SUSE security announcement is
guaranteed by a cryptographic signature in each announcement. All SUSE
security announcements are published with a valid signature.

To verify the signature of the announcement, save it as text into a file
and run the command

gpg <file>

replacing <filewith the name of the file where you saved the
announcement. The output for a valid signature looks like:

gpg: Signature made <DATEusing RSA key ID 3D25D3D9
gpg: Good signature from "SuSE Security Team <security (AT) suse (DOT) de>"

where <DATEis replaced by the date the document was signed.

If the security team's key is not contained in your key ring, you can
import it from the first installation CD. To import the key, use the
command

gpg

- Package authenticity verification:

SUSE update packages are available on many mirror FTP servers all over the
world. While this service is considered valuable and important to the free
and open source software community, the authenticity and the integrity of
a package needs to be verified to ensure that it has not been tampered
with.

There are two verification methods that can be used independently from
each other to prove the authenticity of a downloaded file or RPM package:

1) Using the internal gpg signatures of the rpm package
2) MD5 checksums as provided in this announcement

1) The internal rpm package signatures provide an easy way to verify the
authenticity of an RPM package. Use the command

rpm -v <file.rpm>

to verify the signature of the package, replacing <file.rpmwith the
filename of the RPM package downloaded. The package is unmodified if it
contains a valid signature from build (AT) suse (DOT) de with the key ID 9C800ACA.

This key is automatically imported into the RPM database (on
RPMv4-based distributions) and the gpg key ring of 'root' during
installation. You can also find it on the first installation CD and at
the end of this announcement.

2) If you need an alternative means of verification, use the md5sum
command to verify the authenticity of the packages. Execute the command

md5sum <filename.rpm>

after you downloaded the file from a SUSE FTP server or its mirrors.
Then compare the resulting md5sum with the one that is listed in the
SUSE security announcement. Because the announcement containing the
checksums is cryptographically signed (by security (AT) suse (DOT) de), the
checksums show proof of the authenticity of the package if the
signature of the announcement is valid. Note that the md5 sums
published in the SUSE Security Announcements are valid for the
respective packages only. Newer versions of these packages cannot be
verified.

- SUSE runs two security mailing lists to which any interested party may
subscribe:

suse-security (AT) suse (DOT) com
- General Linux and SUSE security discussion.
All SUSE security announcements are sent to this list.
To subscribe, send an e-mail to
<suse-security-subscribe (AT) suse (DOT) com>.

suse-security-announce (AT) suse (DOT) com
- SUSE's announce-only mailing list.
SUSE's security announcements are sent to this list.
To subscribe, send an e-mail to
<@suse.com>.

For general information or the frequently asked questions (FAQ),
send mail to <suse-security-info (AT) suse (DOT) comor
<suse-security-faq (AT) suse (DOT) com>.


SUSE's security contact is <security (AT) suse (DOT) comor <security (AT) suse (DOT) de>.
The <security (AT) suse (DOT) depublic key is listed below.



The information in this advisory may be distributed or reproduced,
provided that the advisory is not modified in any way. In particular, the
clear text signature should show proof of the authenticity of the text.

SUSE Linux Products GmbH provides no warranties of any kind whatsoever
with respect to the information contained in this security advisory.

Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID
pub 2048R/3D25D3D9 1999-03-06 SuSE Security Team <security (AT) suse (DOT) de>
pub 1024D/9C800ACA 2000-10-19 SuSE Package Signing Key <build (AT) suse (DOT) de>

- PGP PUBLIC KEY BLCK
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)



























+





























=ypVs
- PGP PUBLIC KEY BLCK

PGP SIGNATURE
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)







=71lv
PGP SIGNATURE

--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help (AT) suse (DOT) com
Security-related bug reports go to security (AT) suse (DOT) de, not here

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Web Development Archives Mailing Lists Linux Security > SUSE Security Announcement: MozillaFirefox, MozillaThunderbird,


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 1 hosted by Hostway
Stay green...Green IT