Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?

Rainer Weikusat wrote:

You misunderstand my point. To state that 'the behavious is undefined'
means 'no information regarding this behaviour is available'.

No, it means -- here -- that no restrictions on the behaviour have been
given by the standard.

Although it's just occurred to me to wonder why, say, `i += 1` can't
deliver nasal demons. After all, the Standard only covers the abstract
behaviour of the implementation. An implementation where every addition
operation nasalised you wouldn't be conformant /just because of that/,
would it?

--
Chris "ha-SH!" Dollin

Hewlett-Packard Limited registered office: Cain Road, Bracknell,
registered no: 690597 England Berks RG12 1HN